GettingTruth

RandallJones

When did they have a chance to put the explosives in the WTC Towers?

People may wonder when was there a chance to place explosives in the World Trade Center towers. Here is a brief video that helps to explain this. Starting in about a minute and a half into the video there is a discussion about peopple who worked in the World Trade Center Towers who said that prior to 9/11 there had been several unexplained evacuations and power downs in the towers.

9/11 Truth: Unusual Evacuations & Power-Downs in the WTC Prior To 9/11

 Now that I think about it, there were many parts of the WTC that were vacant (not rented) before 9/11, this probably shortened the amount of time needed for the buildings to be evacuated. Here is an article (see second item called “Skyscaper Award”) that talks about how before 9/11 the WTC 7 was mostly vacant and after 9/11, when it was rebuilt, it has become attractive as office space.
http://www.downtownexpress.com/de_211/undercover.html

Advertisements

July 13, 2007 - Posted by | 9/11, terrorism, Uncategorized, United States, war on terror, World Trade Center, WTC, WTC 7

2 Comments »

  1. I find it strange that people think the inability to answer when, why and who about explosives is proof of something. Why don’t we know the distribution of mass of the towers after SIX YEARS and why do people scream “Inside Job” instead of ask obvious questions?

    I went to an engineering school for electrical engineering. My pledge father was an architect. We joked about the architects taking funny physics and funny math. But we could see the Sears Tower being constructed from camput so there was a lot of talk about it.

    How can you buid a 110 story skyscraper without figuring out how much steel and how much concrete to put on every level? Every level must be strong enough to support the combined weights of all higher levels. So why is it after SIX YEARS we don’t have a table specifying the TONS of STEEL and TONS of CONCRETE on every level of the towers?

    The lighter top portion could not crush the lower heavier portion at nearly freefall acceleration. It is partly that conservation of momentum thing. But to PROVE that we must know the distribution of mass of steel and concrete. It is certainly interesting that the NIST could not even specify the total quantity of concrete in the towers.

    How is it that the nation that put men on the moon 38 years ago can’t provide such simple information about buildings designed before the moon landing? How absurd has this nation become? Why don’t Iranian engineers get together and show the world how ridiculous that is?

    Comment by psikeyhackr | April 29, 2008 | Reply

  2. The problem is not the lack of scientists to study the 9/11 crime scene, it’s the lack of will in finding out how and who carried out the 9/11 attacks.

    Comment by randalljones | April 30, 2008 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: